This Article argues that the Palsgraf perspective is mistaken and proposes a different moral picture of tort law’s normative substance and doctrinal structure. Tort law may be centrally concerned with “common morality,” rather than promoting the welfare of society at large.26 But torts are not relational legal wrongs, and their purpose is not to recognize or redress relational moral wrongs. Torts are remedial pigeonholes: legal liability rules that identify the complex conditions under which a defendant is morally liable to provide a plaintiff with compensation or other forms of remedial relief. Rather than recognizing a species of relational moral wrongdoing or interpersonal mistreatment, a tort such as negligence is a coarse doctrinal device that identifies instances of “moral wrongdoing for which the offender must pay,”27 whether or not he has treated the plaintiff wrongfully. Other torts identify forms of behavior that render a defendant liable to pay compensation for resulting injuries although he has not behaved wrongfully at all. In both negligence and the other torts, a defendant may be liable to compensate a plaintiff even if he has not wronged or mistreated her. Contra the Palsgraf perspective, relational moral wrongdoing is not the basis of remedial liability, either in ordinary morality or the law of torts.
СюжетЗемлетрясение в Сочи
。Snipaste - 截图 + 贴图是该领域的重要参考
Blaze, believed to have started in vape shop, gutted building next to station and destroyed shops, salon and cafe
to enter a domain name and keywords. From there, you can quickly decide whether
Annualized revenue from AI-first products more than tripled year over year, Narayen said in a statement accompanying the earnings release. “Our mission to empower everyone to create represents an even larger opportunity as content powers all experiences in the AI era,” he said.